ArticleBMC medical education2025
Evaluating dental students' satisfaction in clinical Periodontics courses at KSAU-HS: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA) in Saudi Arabia underscores the importance of assessing student satisfaction to ensure program quality. No previous studies have explored the satisfaction levels of dental students enrolled in clinical Periodontics courses at King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS). This study aims to assess dental students' satisfaction with clinical Periodontics courses and to explore potential differences in satisfaction based on gender and academic level.
methodsThis cross-sectional study surveyed dental students enrolled in Periodontics courses at KSAU-HS during the 2022-2023 academic year. A web-based questionnaire was distributed via email. The survey covered six categories: learning objectives, course materials, content relevance, instructor knowledge, delivery style, and facility environment. Responses were analyzed using chi-square tests for gender differences and t-tests to compare satisfaction between third- and fourth-year students.
resultsThe study included a balanced distribution of male (47.92%) and female (52.08%) participants, with 68.75% in their third year and 31.25% in their fourth year. Overall, students reported high satisfaction, with over 90% agreeing they understood the learning objectives and felt confident in applying their knowledge. No significant differences were found between male and female students (mean scores: 95.49 vs. 95.48) or between third- and fourth-year students (mean scores: 95.56 vs. 95.31), indicating consistent satisfaction across these groups.
conclusionHigh levels of satisfaction with clinical Periodontics courses at KSAU-HS suggest effective course design, clear objectives, and relevant content. The lack of significant associations with gender or academic level implies a uniformly positive educational experience. These findings underscore the importance of aligning course design with best practices in dental education to ensure graduates are well-prepared for clinical practice on a global scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.