ArticleBMC oral health2025
Physical, chemical and biological properties of MTA Angelus and novel AGM MTA: an in vitro analysis.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modified Formulations of Silicate-Based Cements: Comparative Study of Physicochemical Properties.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cytotoxicity of Root Canal Sealers and Potential Clinical Implications: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of biocompatibility, antimicrobial activity, and immunomodulatory effects of mineral trioxide aggregate modified with zeolite-clinoptilolite as a root-end filling material.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Physicochemical evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate and five mineral oxides calcium silicate-based cements.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Radiopacity, pH, and Calcium Ion Release of Calcium Silicate and Epoxy Resin-based Endodontic Cements.Iranian endodontic journal · 2025Article
- Endodontic bioceramics: current and futurity aspects.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is a calcium silicate-based cement that has changed conventional dental therapeutic approaches. This study aimed to evaluate physical, chemical and biological properties of novel AGM MTA, in comparison with MTA Angelus.
methodsThe samples were prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions. The initial and final setting times were measured via a Gillmore needle following the ISO 6876:2012 standard. The radiopacity of the materials was evaluated against an aluminium step wedge on the basis of the ISO 6876 and 13,116 standards. The pH changes were measured at intervals of 3, 6, 24, 72, 96 and 144 h postimmersion in Hank's solution and calcium ion release was analysed after 168 h of immersion via inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP‒OES). Moreover, the cytotoxicity was assessed through the MTT assay on human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) after 24 and 72 h of exposure to the set/fresh status of various dilutions of MTA extracts, following the ISO 10993-12 standard.
resultsNo significant difference was found between the initial setting times of the two materials (Angelus: 11.0 ± 1.0 min, AGM: 10.3 ± 1.5 min); however, MTA Angelus demonstrated a significantly shorter final setting time. Both materials met the minimum radiopacity requirements according to the ISO 6876 standard, with MTA Angelus exhibiting greater radiopacity than AGM MTA. Both materials created an alkaline environment without presenting any differences in each time point and AGM MTA released significantly greater amounts of calcium ions. In the cytotoxicity assessment, while the diluted extracts of both materials did not elicit any cytotoxic effects, the nondiluted samples, after 72 h of exposure, as well as the 30-min set AGM MTA after 24 h of exposure, were shown to be cytotoxic.
conclusionsIn conclusion, MTA Angelus presented a faster setting time and lower cytotoxicity, while AGM MTA demonstrated greater calcium ion release. However, both materials presented clinically acceptable properties and AGM MTA could be a potential alternative to MTA Angelus. However, further clinical studies are required to confirm its application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.