ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Cough recognition in pneumoconiosis patients based on a flexible patch with an embedded ACC sensor for remote monitoring.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging Digital Technologies for Monitoring and Rehabilitation Support in Chronic Dust-Induced Lung Diseases: A Scoping Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Differential diagnosis of pneumoconiosis mass shadows and peripheral lung cancer using CT radiomics and the AdaBoost machine learning model.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany respiratory diseases such as pneumoconiosis require to close monitor the symptoms such as abnormal respiration and cough. This study introduces an automated, nonintrusive method for detecting cough events in clinical settings using a flexible chest patch with tri-axial acceleration sensors.
methodsTwenty-five young healthy persons (hereinafter referred to as healthy adults) and twenty-five clinically diagnosed pneumoconiosis patients (hereinafter referred to as patients) participated in the experiment by wearing a flexible chest patch with an embedded ACC sensor. The top 56% of the highest scoring features were then combined using several feature selection algorithms to perform the cough classification task. The multicriteria decision making (MCDM) method was used to select the classifier with the highest scores.
resultsThe optimized classifier proposed in this paper achieved an accuracy of 87.1%, precision of 95%, recall of 79.1%, F1 score of 86.4%, and AUC of 95.4% for recognizing coughs in healthy adults; an accuracy of 96.1%, precision of 95%, recall of 97.4%, F1 score of 96.2%, and AUC of 98.7% for recognizing coughs in patients; and an overall accuracy of 92% for distinguishing coughs in the combined group of healthy adults and patients.
conclusionsOur study demonstrated the effectiveness of an automated cough recognition system in both pneumoconiosis patients and healthy adults. This approach facilitates daily remote monitoring of cough occurrence in individuals with pneumoconiosis, potentially enhancing the ability of physicians to evaluate clinical status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.