ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes according to maternal age in the context of China's two-child policy.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ideal birth spacing between the first and second child among reproductive-aged women in Shandong Province, China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Association of excessive daytime sleepiness with anxiety, depressive symptoms, and quality of work life among maternal and child health nurses.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSince the implementation of China's comprehensive two-child policy, the prevalence of long interpregnancy intervals (IPI) and advanced maternal age has increased. However, previous studies in China have mostly focused on the relationship between short IPIs and adverse perinatal outcomes, while neglecting maternal age as a potential confounder.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 23,899 pregnant women who delivered between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 at Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital and West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University. IPIs were categorized as < 18 months, 18-23 months, 24-59 months, 60-119 months, and ≥ 120 months. Their relationships with clinical characteristics and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed using chi-square tests and Cochran-Armitage test for trend. Logistic regression modeling, incorporating restricted cubic spline (RCS), was used to assess association between IPI and adverse perinatal outcomes, including full-term low birthweight (LBW), preterm birth (PTB), small-for-gestational age (SGA) and adverse neonatal composite (very low birthweight, very preterm birth, severe neonatal asphyxia or death).
resultsWomen with longer IPIs (≥ 120 months) were more likely to be older (≥ 35 years) and had higher rates of gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (p < 0.05). Compared to an IPI of 24-59 months, the risk of PTB was significantly higher with an IPI of ≥ 120 months for women aged ≥ 35 years (aOR,1.17; 95% CI, 0.89-1.55) and 30-34 years (aOR 2.17; 95% CI, 1.59-2.92), but not for those aged ≤ 29 years (aOR 1.34; 95% CI, 0.20-5.31). The risk of SGA increased with an IPI of ≥ 120 months for women aged 30-34 years (aOR, 2.19; 95% CI, 0.97-4.53) and with an IPI of 60-119 months for women aged ≤ 29 years (aOR,3.16; 95% CI, 1.62-6.30). Full-term LBW risk was elevated among women aged ≤ 29 years with an IPI of ≥ 120 months (aOR, 10.42; 95% CI, 0.55-59.52). However, there were no significant differences in the risk of adverse neonatal composite across different IPI groups with each age category (p > 0.05).
conclusionA long IPI increased the risk of SGA, full-term LBW and PTB, regardless of maternal age. Medical professionals should advise women an optimal IPI to mitigate these risks. With China's shift from a "one-child" to a "three-child" policy, future research will focus on analyzing this new fertility pattern to refine IPI recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.