ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
Application of GUHA data mining method in cohort data to explore paths associated with premature death: a 29-year follow-up study.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
methodThis study set out to identify the factors and combinations of factors associated with the individual's premature death, using data from the Finnish Longitudinal Study on Ageing Municipal Employees (FLAME) which involved 6,257 participants over a 29-year follow-up period. Exact dates of death were obtained from the Finnish population register. Premature death was defined as a death occurring earlier than the age- and sex-specific actuarial life expectancy indicated by life tables for 1981, as the baseline, with the threshold period of nine months. Explanatory variables encompassed sociodemographic characteristics, health and functioning, health behaviors, subjective experiences, working conditions, and work abilities. Data were mined using the General Unary Hypothesis Automaton (GUHA) method, implemented with LISp-Miner software. GUHA involves an active dialogue between the user and the LISp-Miner software, with parameters tailored to the data and user interests. The parameters used are not absolute but depend on the data to be mined and the user's interests.
resultsOver the follow-up period, 2,196 deaths were recorded, of which 70.4% were premature. Seven single factors and 67 sets of criteria (paths) were statistically significantly associated with premature mortality, passing the one-sided Fisher test. Single predicates of premature death included smoking, consuming alcohol a few times a month or once a week, poor self-rated fitness, incompetence to work and poor assured workability in two years' time, and diseases causing work disability. Notably, most of the factors selected as single predicates of premature mortality did not appear in the multi-predicate paths. Factors appearing in the paths were smoking more than 20 cigarettes a day, symptoms that impaired functioning, past smoking, absence of musculoskeletal diseases, poor self-rated health, having pain, male sex, being married, use of medication, more physical strain compared to others, and high life satisfaction, intention to retire due to reduced work ability caused by diseases and demanding work. Sex-specific analysis revealed similar findings.
conclusionThe findings indicate that associations between single predictors and premature mortality should be interpreted with caution, even when adjusted for a limited number of other factors. This highlights the complexity of premature mortality and the need for comprehensive models considering multiple interacting factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.