ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
In Vivo Confocal Microscopy for Automated Detection of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Study Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objectives of this study are to construct a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model to diagnose and classify meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) based on the in vivo confocal microscope (IVCM) images and to evaluate the performance of the DCNN model and its auxiliary significance for clinical diagnosis and treatment. We extracted 6643 IVCM images from the three hospitals' IVCM database as the training set for the DCNN model and 1661 IVCM images from the other two hospitals' IVCM database as the test set to examine the performance of the model. Construction of the DCNN model was performed using DenseNet-169. The results of MGD classifications by three ophthalmologists were used to calculate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, recall, true negative rate (TNR), true positive rate (TPR), and false positive rate (FPR) of the model. The deep learning (DL) was used to build the model to identify the IVCM images. Model accuracy and loss tests showed that the DCNN model had high accuracy, low loss, and no large fluctuations at an epoch of 175, indicating that DenseNet-169 could enable the dichotomization to proceed stably. The accuracy of each classification of the test set was above 90%, which was highly consistent with the ophthalmologists' diagnosis. The precision of the groups in each classification was more than 90%, or even close to 100%, except for the meibomian gland atrophy with obstruction group in the fifth classification. The recall ranged from 0.8728 to 0.9981, and the FPR was low in the screening and classification diagnoses. The application of DCNN can achieve accurate classification and diagnosis of MGD through IVCM images and has great potential during medical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.