Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39871042›Full record

SynthesisJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Systematic Review of Hybrid Vision Transformer Architectures for Radiological Image Analysis.

Ji Woong Kim, Aisha Urooj Khan, Imon Banerjee

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ji Woong KimSchool of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Aisha Urooj KhanDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Imon BanerjeeSchool of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA. Banerjee.Imon@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3327-8004

Funding

Multimodal AI Fusion Model for Early Detection for Pancreatic CancerR01CA289249 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Imon Banerjee, Yifan Peng · 2024 to 2026
$2.8M
Opportunistic Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Estimation at Abdominal CTs with Robust and Unbiased Deep LearningR01HL167974 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Imon Banerjee, Akshay Chaudhari · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA289249NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL167974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision transformer (ViT)and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) each possess distinct strengths in medical imaging: ViT excels in capturing long-range dependencies through self-attention, while CNNs are adept at extracting local features via spatial convolution filters. While ViT may struggle with capturing detailed local spatial information, critical for tasks like anomaly detection in medical imaging, shallow CNNs often fail to effectively abstract global context. This study aims to explore and evaluate hybrid architectures that integrate ViT and CNN to leverage their complementary strengths for enhanced performance in medical vision tasks, such as segmentation, classification, reconstruction, and prediction. Following PRISMA guideline, a systematic review was conducted on 34 articles published between 2020 and Sept. 2024. These articles proposed novel hybrid ViT-CNN architectures specifically for medical imaging tasks in radiology. The review focused on analyzing architectural variations, merging strategies between ViT and CNN, innovative applications of ViT, and efficiency metrics including parameters, inference time (GFlops), and performance benchmarks. The review identified that integrating ViT and CNN can mitigate the limitations of each architecture offering comprehensive solutions that combine global context understanding with precise local feature extraction. We benchmarked the articles based on architectural variations, merging strategies, innovative uses of ViT, and efficiency metrics (number of parameters, inference time (GFlops), and performance), and derived a ranked list. By synthesizing current literature, this review defines fundamental concepts of hybrid vision transformers and highlights emerging trends in the field. It provides a clear direction for future research aimed at optimizing the integration of ViT and CNN for effective utilization in medical imaging, contributing to advancements in diagnostic accuracy and image analysis. We performed systematic review of hybrid vision transformer architecture using PRISMA guideline and performed thorough comparative analysis to benchmark the architectures.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerHumansHybrid architectureImage analysisRadiologyVision transformer

Identifiers

PMID39871042
PMCPMC12572492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.