ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Multi-level Factors to Build Confidence and Support in Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Key Determinants Influencing Treatment Decision-Making for and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundActive surveillance (AS) is the guideline-recommended treatment for low-risk prostate cancer and involves routine provider visits, lab tests, imaging, and prostate biopsies. Despite good uptake, adherence to AS, in terms of receiving recommended follow-up testing and remaining on AS in the absence of evidence of cancer progression, remains challenging.
objectiveWe sought to better understand urologist, primary care providers (PCPs), and patient experiences with AS care delivery to identify opportunities to improve adherence.
designA qualitative study involving patients, PCPs, and urologists with experience of AS.
participantsPCPs (19), urologists (15), and patients (15) in Michigan. APPROACH: Participants were recruited through a statewide quality improvement collaborative. Semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually from June 2020 to April 2021. The Theoretical Domains Framework and the Behavior Change Wheel's Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation model guided interviews and coding. Thematic analysis was used to identify shared perspectives on AS care delivery.
resultsThree main themes emerged from the PCP, urologist, and patient data collected related to AS care delivery that were needed to improve AS adherence: (1) building patient confidence in AS by leveraging provider roles and expertise and creating connection through communication across the care team and with patients; (2) building confidence in AS through psychosocial support by involving families and peers, and addressing anxiety and uncertainty; (3) building AS support within healthcare processes and electronic health record systems.
conclusionThese themes reflect opportunities for interventions at the care team, community (family and peers), and health system levels that could better support individualized care and overcome challenges to AS adherence through team-based approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.