Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39870970›Full record

SynthesisLasers in medical science2025

Clinical efficacy of lasers in the management of recurrent aphthous ulcers of oral cavity: a systematic review of randomized control trials.

Zain Al-Zainal, Sarib Farid Ashraf, Divya Gopinath

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zain Al-ZainalCollege of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Sarib Farid AshrafCollege of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Divya GopinathCollege of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates. d.gopinath@ajman.ac.ae.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is one of mankind's most common diseases with a nonspecific etiology. Lasers are gaining traction in dentistry due to their remarkable effects on pain reduction. Their convenience and lack of side effects have made them an attractive alternative to conventional interventions. This systematic review aims to summarize the current evidence on the efficacy of lasers in managing recurrent aphthous ulcers. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The databases PubMed, Scopus, and EBSCOHost were electronically queried to retrieve trials published until July 2024 using the appropriate keywords. The outcomes evaluated include pain reduction, healing duration, and lesion size reduction. The bias assessment was conducted using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias method designed explicitly for randomized trials (Protocol Registration No: INPLASY2024110096). After evaluating the eligibility of 311 articles, 24 trials were included in the final review. Of 24 trials, data from 16 trials demonstrated that laser therapy is more efficacious in pain reduction than the control regardless of its power. Eleven of the included articles showed that low-level laser therapy had a shorter healing time than the control group. Six trials presented data indicating that low-level laser therapy results in a more significant reduction in ulcer diameter. Current evidence show that low-level as well as CO2 laser treatment are superior to conventional therapy for pain management in RAS. Future research should focus on determining the ideal laser treatment settings by standardizing parameters and outcome measurements to achieve maximum pain reduction and healing in RAS.

Indexed as

Low-Level Light TherapyStomatitis, AphthousHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeAphthous ulcersLaserLLLTOral ulcersPBMT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.