Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39870969›Full record

ArticleAmbio2025

Green companions: Affordances of human-tree relationships.

Kaisa Kristiina Vainio, Tuomo Takala, Juul Limpens, Karoliina Lummaa, Aino Korrensalo, Aleksi Räsänen, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaisa Kristiina VainioSchool of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland. kaisa.vainio@uef.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-8923-1920
Tuomo TakalaSchool of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.
Juul LimpensDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Karoliina LummaaDepartment of History Culture and Art Studies, University of Turku, Turku, Finland & BIOS Research Unit, Helsinki, Finland.
Aino KorrensaloDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland & Natural Resources Institute Finland, Joensuu, Finland.
Aleksi RäsänenNatural Resources Institute Finland, Oulu, Finland.
Eeva-Stiina TuittilaSchool of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.

Funding

Academy of Finland 337550Koneen Säätiö 201803392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trees offer multiple benefits, including impacts on physical and mental health. In this interdisciplinary study, we explored the relationships humans develop with specific favourite trees based on our survey data (n = 158) collected in the Netherlands. Here, we examined action possibilities (affordances) provided by trees, including immaterial actions, such as memorisation or the enjoyment of beauty. We implemented the affordance theory with mixed-method analysis. We identified three distinct types of human-arboreal relationships offering a different variety of action possibilities: nostalgic relationships, nurturing relationships, and empowering relationships. We assume that when humans form relationships with trees, the essence of trees is not their characteristics, but the possibilities for action. We recommend that urban green spaces would support interactions between humans and trees. By strengthening our connectedness with nature, it is possible to promote both human well-being and to strengthen environmentally responsible values and behaviours.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsTreesFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsAffectAffordance theoryCultural ecosystem servicesCultural plant studiesHuman-nature relationshipUrban planning

Identifiers

PMID39870969
PMCPMC11965079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.