ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
"The biggest challenge is there's never a routine": a qualitative study of the time burdens of cancer care at home.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time toxicity among patients with cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Characterizing the Objective Time Spent on Health Care Activities in Clinic and at Home for Patients With Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- The experience of time toxicity in cancer patients: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Review
- Caregiver experiences of healthcare-related administrative burden: a scoping review.Health affairs scholar · 2026Review
- Accuracy of patient, care partner, and clinician health care contact day recall.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Time-Toxicity Indicators and Mitigation Strategies in Cancer Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Experiences and perceived determinants of healthcare-related time toxicity among women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a qualitative study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Patient-, care partner-, and clinician-proposed solutions to address the time toxicity of cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- The weight of time: experience of time toxicity among advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers-a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Comparing the time spent in clinic by patients receiving, subcutaneous and intravenous formulations of cancer drugs: A pilot study.Journal of cancer policy · 2025Article
- The association of health care contact days with economic measures in the CCTG LY.12 trial.The oncologist · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAs cancer care is increasingly delivered in the home, more tasks and responsibilities fall on patients and their informal care partners. These time costs can present significant mental, physical, and financial burdens, and are undercounted in current measures of time toxicity that only consider care received in formal healthcare settings.
methodsSemi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with patients with gastrointestinal cancer and informal care partners at a single tertiary cancer center between March and October 2023. Interviews explored cancer care tasks conducted when home, associated time burdens, how these time burdens compared to facility-based care, and whether home-based care should be included in objective measures of time toxicity. Two coders transcribed interviews and analyzed data using a grounded theory approach.
resultsA single interviewer conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 patients and 18 care partners, and identified five major themes: (1) unexpected home-based care activities are time burdensome; (2) other burdens interact with and impact time burdens; (3) time burdens evolve over the disease course and differentially impact patients and care partners; (4) several factors influence the choice of home-based versus in-facility care; and (5) home-based care is generally perceived as less time-burdensome than in-facility care. Overall, 12 of 33 (36%) participants recommended including days with home-based care in the current contact days measure of time toxicity.
conclusionIn addition to characterizing time burdens associated with home-based cancer care, this study builds on existing literature to explore if and how to incorporate days with home-based care into the contact days measure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.