SynthesisInternational journal of impotence research2025
Botulinum toxin-A is ineffective in premature ejaculation treatment: insights from a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Role of Subcoronal Botulinum Toxin Injection in the Management of Premature Ejaculation.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ejaculatory reflex consists of emission and expulsion, with the latter involving rhythmic muscular contractions that propel seminal fluid. Botulinum toxin, through its inhibitory effects, has been hypothesized to improve premature ejaculation (PE). This study evaluates high-quality evidence on botulinum toxin-A injections into the bulbospongiosal muscle as a treatment for PE. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) following PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes included intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) scores, and complications. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel and R. ROB-2, Eggers test, and GRADE assessed risk of bias, publication bias, and certainty of evidence (CoE). Three RCTs were eligible, and covered data from 228 patients with (1:1) randomisation into intervention and control arms (100 units of botulinum toxin-A in 10 mLs versus 10 mLs of 0.9% NaCl). IELT increases were noted with averages of 39.6, 11.5, and 2.4 s at 1, 3, and 6 months of follow up, respectively. Likewise, PEP scores demonstrated improvements of 1.54, 1.08, and 0.36 units at the same follow up intervals. however, statistical significance was not achieved in both outcomes of interest. Post-procedural complications were recorded in 11 patients (9.6%) with 10 in the intervention group. The majority of patients had voiding difficulties (n = 5) & mild erectile dysfunction (n = 4), however, all adverse events (AEs) were self-resolving and did not require active treatment. Given our findings, current high-quality evidence does not support using Botulinum Toxin-A in the management of PE. Larger scale & standardised RCTs are recommended to conclusively outline its clinical benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39870913What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.