ArticleThe AAPS journal2025
Impact of Weak Vibration Generated by a Refrigerator on Protein Aggregation.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein aggregates and particles in biopharmaceuticals can induce adverse immune responses in patients. Thus, suppression of the formation of protein aggregates and particles is important for the successful development of therapeutic proteins. Mechanical stresses, including agitation, are widely recognized as stress factors that generate protein aggregates and particles. However, although refrigerators and storage chambers generate weak vibration, there have been no studies of the impact of such weak vibration on aggregate and particle formation during storage. In this study, monomer loss and aggregate formation of a CTLA4-Ig were evaluated during storage in a refrigerator (having a vibration acceleration less than 0.006 G) with or without three vibration isolators. The vibration isolators reduced the vibration acceleration, thereby decreasing the rate of monomer loss and nanometer-sized aggregate formation. The increase in the aggregation rate due to the weak vibration was not mitigated by adding poloxamer 188 or eliminating the air-liquid interface, which are processes known to be effective in preventing protein aggregation due to mechanical stresses. Thus, reducing vibration should be an effective way to mitigate the risk of aggregate formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39870844What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.