ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning based decision-making and outcome prediction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with posterior surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Algorithmic fairness reporting in artificial intelligence for spinal deformity: a systematic review.Spine deformity · 2026Review
- State-of-the-art review in AI and digital technologies for spine deformity.Spine deformity · 2026Review
- AI parameters for enhancing spine surgery outcomes: a narrative review.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Review
- From Algorithms to Clinics: Recent Progress in AI for Scoliosis Diagnosis and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Long-Term Management of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in Adulthood: Clinical Challenges and Progress During the Critical Period of Pregnancy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of Transformer- and Convolutional Neural Network-Based Deep Learning Models to Predict Curve Progression in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The application of robotic and artificial intelligence technologies in spinal surgery: a review focused on prospects in remote areas of China.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Orthopedics: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the emergence of numerous classifications, surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can be guided more effectively. However, surgical decision-making and optimal strategies still lack standardization and personalized customization. Our study aims to devise proper deep learning (DL) models that incorporate key factors influencing surgical outcomes on the coronal plane in AIS patients to facilitate surgical decision-making and predict surgical results for AIS patients. A total of 425 AIS patients who underwent posterior spinal fixation were collected. Variables such as age, gender, preoperative and final follow-up horizontal and vertical coordinate vectors, and screw positioning data were preprocessed by parameterizing image data and transforming various data types into a unified, continuous high-dimensional feature space. Four deep learning models were designed, including Multi-Layer Perceptron model, Encoder-Decoder model, CNN-LSTM Attention model and Deep FM model. For the implementation of deep learning, 70% of the data was adopted for training and 30% for evaluation. The mean square error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and curve fitting between the predicted and corresponding real postoperative spinal coordinates of the test set were adopted to validate and compare the efficacy of the DL models. A total of 425 patients with an average age of 14.60 ± 2.08 years, including 77 males and 348 females, were enrolled in this study. The Lenke type 1 and 5 AIS patients accounted for the majority of the included patients. The results showed that the Multi-Layer Perceptron model achieved the best performance among the four DL models, with a mean square error of 2.77 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.