ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi task opinion enhanced hybrid BERT model for mental health analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- MultiMindNet: AI-based mental health analysis using hybrid deep learning approach and Hybrid Ant-Grey Wolf Optimization (HAGWO) algorithm.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- A data-centric approach to detecting and mitigating demographic bias in pediatric mental health text.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Scalable depression monitoring with smartphone speech using a multimodal benchmark and topic analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- A multi-task deep learning approach for landslide displacement prediction with applications in early warning systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the nuanced emotions and points of view included in user-generated content remains challenging, even though text data analysis for mental health is a crucial instrument for assessing emotional well-being. Most current models neglect the significance of integrating viewpoints in comprehending mental health in favor of single-task learning. To offer a more thorough knowledge of mental health, in this study, we present an Opinion-Enhanced Hybrid BERT Model (Opinion-BERT), built to handle multi-task learning for simultaneous sentiment and status categorization. With the help of TextBlob and SciPy, we extracted opinions and dynamically constructed new opinion embeddings to complement the pre-trained BERT model. Using a hybrid architecture, these embeddings are integrated with the contextual embeddings of BERT, whereby the CNN and BiGRU layers collected local and sequential characteristics. This combination helps our model to identify and categorize user status and attitudes from the text more accurately, which leads to more accurate mental health assessments. When we compared the performance of Opinion-BERT to some baseline models, including BERT, RoBERTa, and DistilBERT, we found that it performed much better. Opinion-enhanced embeddings are crucial for improving performance, as demonstrated by our multi-task learning framework's 96.77% sentiment classification accuracy of 94.22% status classification accuracy. This work provides a more nuanced understanding of emotions and psychological states by demonstrating the potential of combining opinion and sentiment data for mental health analysis in a multi-task learning environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.