ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing photovoltaic power plant forecasting with dynamic neural network structure refinement.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resilient frequency stabilization of renewable-penetrated microgrids via deep learning and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quadrant swapping technique for partial shaded solar photovoltaic system.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A photovoltaic power forecasting method based on the LSTM-XGBoost-EEDA-SO model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Elastic net with Bayesian Density Estimation model for feature selection for photovoltaic energy prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable prediction of photovoltaic power generation is key to the efficient management of energy systems in response to the inherent uncertainty of renewable energy sources. Despite advances in weather forecasting, photovoltaic power prediction accuracy remains a challenge. This study presents a novel approach that combines genetic algorithms and dynamic neural network structure refinement to optimize photovoltaic prediction. This methodology dynamically adjusts the neural network parameters during training, including the number of neurons, transfer functions, weights, and biases, to minimize the root mean square error. Evaluation was performed on twelve representative days using annual, monthly, and seasonal data, and a comparison was made with multiple linear regression and nonlinear autoregressive neural network models, demonstrating the approach's effectiveness. Evaluation metrics such as mean square error, R-value, and mean percentage error reveal promising prediction accuracy. MATLAB is used for modeling, training, and testing, and a real 4.2 kW PV plant is used for validation. The results indicate significant improvements, with mean square errors as low as 20 W on cloudy days and 175 W on sunny days. The proposed methodology achieves prediction versus target regressions consistency, with R values ranging from 0.95824 to 0.99980, highlighting its efficiency in providing reliable predictions of PV power generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.