Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39870684›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

The UnconTrust Database for Studies of Unconscious Semantic Processing and Attentional Allocation.

Maor Schreiber, Francois Stockart, Liad Mudrik

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maor SchreiberSchool of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. schreiber@mail.tau.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5731-6748
Francois StockartUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC, 38000, Grenoble, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6945-0638
Liad MudrikSchool of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (L'Institut Canadien de Recherches Avancées) CF-0431 - CP24-072Templeton World Charity Foundation (Templeton World Charity Foundation, Inc.) TWCF0608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The question of what processes can take place without conscious awareness has generated extensive research. Yet there is still no consensus regarding the extent and scope of unconscious processing, and past research abounds with conflicting results. A possible reason for this lack of consensus is the diversity of methods in the field, as the methodological choices might influence the results. Thus far, such possible influence of methods, measures, and analyses has not been systematically investigated and mapped. Here, we present the UnconTrust database for studies of unconscious processing focusing on two major domains - semantic and attentional processing. The database allows researchers to explore potential influences and obtain a bird's eye view on the field with respect to these domains. Currently, the database includes information about the methods and findings of 426 experiments (though notably, the data collected in these experiments is not included). The database is also presented as an interactive website.

Indexed as

AttentionDatabases, FactualSemanticsUnconscious, PsychologyHumans

Identifiers

PMID39870684
PMCPMC11772575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.