Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39870656›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Who is American? A comprehensive analysis of the American = White/Foreign = Asian stereotype (2007-2023).

Kirsten N Morehouse, Tessa E S Charlesworth, Thierry Devos, Mahzarin R Banaji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kirsten N MorehouseDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA. kirsten_morehouse@g.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4659-4479
Tessa E S CharlesworthKellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5048-3088
Thierry DevosDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4546-7555
Mahzarin R BanajiDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5941-7455

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Against the backdrop of increasing ethnic diversity in the U.S., we replicate, extend, and challenge previous examinations of the American = White/Foreign = Asian stereotype in the largest sample to date (N = 666,623 respondents) over 17 years (2007-2023). Six key findings emerged. First, a robust American = White association emerged on implicit (Cohen's d = 0.50) and explicit (Cohen's d = 0.51) measures. Second, the strength of this effect varied by respondents' race/ethnicity with implicit stereotypes strongest among White respondents (Cohen's d = 0.86) and absent among East Asian respondents (Cohen's d = 0.02). Third, the strength of implicit stereotypes was modulated by age, religion, and ideology-older, Christian, and conservative respondents displayed stronger implicit American = White associations-but not gender or education. Fourth, respondents living in U.S. metropolitan areas with greater Asian representation or a history of voting for Democratic candidates exhibited weaker implicit American = White associations. Fifth, over the past 17 years, implicit and explicit American = White associations decreased by 41% and 47%, respectively, and 14/14 demographic subgroups changed towards neutrality. Finally, we observed suggestive evidence that implicit stereotype trends towards neutrality were temporarily disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic for White Americans but not Asian Americans.

Indexed as

AsianStereotypingWhiteAdolescentAdultAgedCOVID-19EthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung AdultAmerican = White associationEthnic-national stereotypesImplicit Association TestImplicit/explicit stereotype change

Identifiers

PMID39870656
PMCPMC11772830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.