ArticleAnnals of family medicine2025
A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Physicians' Approaches to Caring for Adult Adopted Patients.
Article in Annals of family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unmet Health Care Needs of Adult Patients Adopted in Childhood: Insights and Recommendations.Annals of family medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAdoption has lifelong health implications for 7.8 million adopted people and their families in the United States. The majority of adoptees have limited family medical history (LFMH). Primary care physicians (PCPs) rarely receive training about adoptees including their mental health needs and increased suicide risk. The growing availability and popularity of direct-to-consumer genetic testing kits amplifies the need for PCPs to be prepared to address genetic testing for adoptees with LFMH. This study explores PCP training and approaches to adult adopted patients with LFMH.
methodsWe used critical adoption studies as a theoretical framework for this study to understand how adoptive identity might shape clinical experiences. We recruited PCPs from Minnesota and Rhode Island via purposive, criteria-based, reputational sampling. We conducted hour-long semistructured qualitative interviews incorporating hypothetical clinical vignettes. Transcripts were coded via template organizing method and analyzed via Immersion-Crystallization.
resultsWe interviewed 23 PCPs. They reported receiving little training or resources on adult adoptees with LFMH and showed substantial knowledge gaps regarding mental health and genetic testing for this population. Many failed to adjust history-taking and primary care approaches, which they recognized as potentially resulting in inaccuracies, inappropriate clinical care, and microaggressions while inadvertently triggering anxiety, shame, and distrust among patients. A mismatch between adopted patients' and physicians' understandings of family medical history could strain the therapeutic relationship. Nearly all interviewees viewed additional training to care for adult adoptees with LFMH as beneficial.
conclusionFuture research should expand education and training for PCPs on adult adoptees with LFMH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.