Trial reportJournal of neurointerventional surgery2026
Workflow improvements from automated large vessel occlusion detection algorithms are dependent on care team engagement.
Trial report in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutomated machine learning (ML)-based large vessel occlusion (LVO) detection algorithms have been shown to improve in-hospital workflow metrics including door-to-groin time (DTG). The degree to which care team engagement and interaction are required for these benefits remains incompletely characterized.
methodsThis analysis was conducted as a pre-planned post-hoc analysis of a randomized prospective clinical trial. ML-based LVO detection software was implemented at four comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) from January 1, 2021, to February 27, 2022. Patients were included if they underwent endovascular thrombectomy for LVO acute ischemic stroke. ML software utilization was quantified as the total number of active users and the ratio of the number of comments to the number of patients analyzed by the software by site per week. Primary outcome was the reduction in DTG relative to pre-ML implementation by hospital utilization level. Data are expressed as median (IQR).
resultsAmong 101 patients who met the inclusion criteria, the median age was 71 years (IQR 59-79), with 48.5% being female. CSC 4 had the greatest number of total active users per week (32.5 (27.5-34.5)), and comment-to-patient ratio per week (5.8 (4.6-6.9)). Increased ML software utilization was associated with improvements in DTG reduction. For every 1 unit increase in the comment-to-patient ratio, DTG time decreased by 2.6 (95% CI -5.09 to -0.13) min, while accounting for site-level random effects. Number of users-to-patient was not associated with a reduction in DTG time (β=-0.22, 95% CI -1.78 to 1.33).
conclusionsIn this post-hoc analysis, user engagement with software, rather than total number of users, was associated with site-specific improvements in DTG time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.