ArticleAppetite2025
Sex differences in diet-mediated salivary protein upregulation.
Article in Appetite, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our lab previously established that repeated exposure to a bitter diet can increase salivary protein (SP) expression, which corresponds to an increase in acceptance of the bitter stimulus. However, this work was exclusively in male rodents, here we examine sex differences. We found that there are no differences in SP expression (experiment 1) or quinine diet acceptance (experiment 2) across stage of estrous cycle. Yet, males and females differ in feeding behaviors, SP expression, and responses to a quinine diet (experiment 3). On a quinine diet, males accepted the diet much faster than females. Males displayed a compensatory increase in meal number as meal size and rate of feeding decreased with initial exposure to a quinine diet, whereas females decreased meal size and rate of feeding with no compensation in meal number. There were sex differences in SP expression at day 14 of quinine exposure but these were gone by day 24. Both sexes increased acceptance of quinine in a brief access taste test after the feeding trial concluded. These data suggest that males and females have different patterns of bitter diet acceptance, but extended exposure to quinine diet still results in altered bitter taste responding and changes in SP profiles in females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.