ArticlePloS one2025
The link between the atherogenic index of plasma and the risk of hypertension: Analysis from NHANES 2017-2020.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of TyG indices and atherogenic index of plasma with hypertension in the PERSIAN Guilan cohort.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Association between the atherogenic index of plasma and prehypertension or hypertension among adults in Fujian, China: a population-based cross-sectional study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of the atherogenic index of plasma in patients with acute coronary syndrome without standard modifiable risk factors: a machine learning-based cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) is a newly identified metabolic marker for atherosclerosis. However, there are inconsistent conclusions regarding the relationship between AIP and hypertension.
methodsThe study subjects were sourced from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 2017 to 2020. Logistic regression analyses were employed to explore the correlation between AIP and hypertension. The value of AIP in predicting hypertension was assessed using ROC curves, and their nonlinear relationship was described using restricted cubic splines (RCS). Subgroup analyses, interactions, and sensitivity analyses were also conducted.
resultsThe study included 7,067 participants who were sourced from the NHANES database. There were 2723 participants diagnosed hypertension. We observed a notable correlation between AIP and hypertension (OR:1.89, 95%CI: 1.11-3.22, P = 0.019). ROC curve showed AIP had a good predictive value for the onset of hypertension, with the AUC of 0.652 (95% CI:0.639-0.664, p<0.001). RCS found that there existed a nonlinear association between AIP and the incidence of hypertension (p<0.001). Even after excluding individuals under the age of 40 years old, the results still indicate a strong association between AIP and hypertension.
conclusionsAIP may serve as an early biological marker for identifying hypertension, facilitating early screening of susceptible populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.