ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025
The development and evaluation of nine obesity-based indices for gallstones in U.S. adults.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting gallstones risk with body composition analysis and machine learning: a dual-center cohort study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Relative fat mass predicts symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in older adults with metabolic syndrome: a longitudinal cohort study.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- A CVD Classification Model for Individuals With Obesity: Multi-Ethnic Validation Based on Multiple Metabolic Indicators.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2026Article
- Beyond TNM staging: validation of a CT-derived nutritional-inflammatory composite model (RFMmSIS) for prognostication in resectable gastric cancer.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Associations between lipid accumulation indices and gallstone prevalence in Chinese elderly: a community-based study in Fuzhou.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Article
- Risk stratification for gallstones based on 14 obesity and lipid-related Indices: a longitudinal cohort study of 44,030 Chinese adults.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Article
- Relative fat mass and cardiovascular risk in Chinese adults: a nationwide prospective cohort study.Nutrition journal · 2025Article
- Association between cardiometabolic index and gallstones: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2017-2020.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Relative fat mass as a novel predictor of gallstone risk: opportunities and caveats.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Article
- Nonlinear association of physical activity with early cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome risk: a comprehensive analysis of NHANES data from 2007 to 2018.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The role of relative fat mass in gallstone risk assessment: findings from the NHANES 2017-2020 survey.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Association of obesity-related anthropometric indicators with chronic constipation and diarrhea among U.S. adults: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Association between obesity indicators and retinopathy in US adults: NHANES 2005-2008.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGallstones have gradually become a highly prevalent digestive disease worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the association of nine different obesity-related indicators (BRI, RFM, BMI, WC, LAP, CMI, VAI, AIP, TyG) with gallstones and to compare their predictive properties for screening gallstones.
methodsData for this study were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the 2017-2020 cycle, and weighted logistic regression analyses with multi-model adjustment were conducted to explore the association of the nine indicators with gallstones. Subject working curves were analyzed to assess the screening ability of the nine indicators. In addition, the association between the most predictive indicator and gallstones was investigated with smooth curve fitting, and differences in risk across populations were explored with subgroup analyses.
resultsIn total, 3654 participants were involved in the final analysis and 383 (10.48%) carried gallstones. The results of weighted multifactorial logistic regression analysis indicated that BRI, RFM, BMI, WC, LAP, and CMI were independent risk factors for gallstones. The ORs for the highest quartile were 4.13 for RFM, 3.13 for BRI, 2.85 for BMI, 2.86 for WC, 2.45 for LAP, and 1.49 for CMI. The area under the ROC curve for RFM was 0.70. The Delong test compared the performance of different ROCs and revealed that the difference between the area under the curve of RFM and the other metrics was significant ( P < 0.05). Smooth curve fitting suggested a linear positive correlation between RFM and gallstones (LLR > 0.05), especially in women, non-Hispanic White, insufficient physical activity, hypertensive, and diabetic populations.
conclusionRFM, BRI, BMI, WC, LAP, and CMI were essential indicators for recognizing gallstones. By comparison, we realized that RFM was a better predictor of gallstones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.