Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39869395›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025

The development and evaluation of nine obesity-based indices for gallstones in U.S. adults.

Xiaodong Wu, Yanhong Song, Shuodong Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Relative fat mass as a novel predictor of gallstone risk: opportunities and caveats.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaodong WuDepartment of General Surgery.
Yanhong SongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Shuodong WuDepartment of General Surgery.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGallstones have gradually become a highly prevalent digestive disease worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the association of nine different obesity-related indicators (BRI, RFM, BMI, WC, LAP, CMI, VAI, AIP, TyG) with gallstones and to compare their predictive properties for screening gallstones.

methodsData for this study were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the 2017-2020 cycle, and weighted logistic regression analyses with multi-model adjustment were conducted to explore the association of the nine indicators with gallstones. Subject working curves were analyzed to assess the screening ability of the nine indicators. In addition, the association between the most predictive indicator and gallstones was investigated with smooth curve fitting, and differences in risk across populations were explored with subgroup analyses.

resultsIn total, 3654 participants were involved in the final analysis and 383 (10.48%) carried gallstones. The results of weighted multifactorial logistic regression analysis indicated that BRI, RFM, BMI, WC, LAP, and CMI were independent risk factors for gallstones. The ORs for the highest quartile were 4.13 for RFM, 3.13 for BRI, 2.85 for BMI, 2.86 for WC, 2.45 for LAP, and 1.49 for CMI. The area under the ROC curve for RFM was 0.70. The Delong test compared the performance of different ROCs and revealed that the difference between the area under the curve of RFM and the other metrics was significant ( P < 0.05). Smooth curve fitting suggested a linear positive correlation between RFM and gallstones (LLR > 0.05), especially in women, non-Hispanic White, insufficient physical activity, hypertensive, and diabetic populations.

conclusionRFM, BRI, BMI, WC, LAP, and CMI were essential indicators for recognizing gallstones. By comparison, we realized that RFM was a better predictor of gallstones.

Indexed as

GallstonesObesityAdultAgedBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysRisk FactorsUnited StatesWaist Circumference

Identifiers

PMID39869395
PMCPMC12372735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.