Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39869385›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025

Developing predictive nomogram models using quantitative electroencephalography for brain function in type a aortic dissection: a prospective observational study.

Ya-Peng Wang, Yi Jiang, Lin Mi, Wen-Xue Liu, Yun-Xing Xue, Yang Chen, Xuan Luo, Yong-Qing Cheng, Jun Pan, Jason Zhensheng Qu and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ya-Peng WangDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yi JiangDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Lin MiDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing Jiangsu, China.
Wen-Xue LiuDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing Jiangsu, China.
Yun-Xing XueDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing Jiangsu, China.
Yang ChenDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing Jiangsu, China.
Xuan LuoDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing Jiangsu, China.
Yong-Qing ChengDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing Jiangsu, China.
Jun PanDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing Jiangsu, China.
Jason Zhensheng QuDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Dong-Jin WangDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundType A aortic dissection (TAAD) remains a significant challenge in cardiac surgery, presenting high risks of adverse outcomes such as permanent neurological dysfunction and mortality despite advances in medical technology and surgical techniques. This study investigates the use of quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) to monitor and predict neurological outcomes during the perioperative period in TAAD patients.

methodsThis prospective observational study was conducted at the hospital, involving patients undergoing TAAD surgery from February 2022 to January 2023. QEEG parameters, including the dynamic amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) grade, which assesses changes in brain function over time, alongside aEEG and relative band power (RBP), were monitored and analyzed to assess brain function preoperatively, intraoperatively, and within 2 hours postoperatively. A predictive nomogram model was developed using these QEEG metrics along with other clinical variables to forecast neurological outcomes.

resultsIn this study, we analyzed the factors contributing to adverse outcomes (AO) and transient neurological dysfunction (TND) following TAAD surgery. For AO, multivariable analysis identified pre-mental status (odds ratio [OR] = 4.652, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.316-10.074, P < 0.001), cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR = 1.014, 95% CI = 1.006-1.023, P = 0.001), and dynamic aEEG grade (OR = 9.926, 95% CI = 4.493-25.268, P < 0.001) as independent risk factors. The AO model showed high discriminative ability with an area under the curve of 0.888 (95% CI = 0.818-0.960) and good calibration (Brier score = 0.0728). For TND, significant preoperative differences included dynamic aEEG grade ( P < 0.001) and Log(Post-RBP Alpha%) (6.00 vs. 4.00, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR = 1.014, 95% CI = 1.006-1.023, P = 0.001), Post-RBP Alpha% (OR = 0.263, 95% CI = 0.121-0.532, P < 0.001), and dynamic aEEG grade (OR = 12.444, 95% CI = 5.337-30.814, P < 0.001) as independent risk factors. The TND model had an area under the curve of 0.893 (95% CI = 0.844-0.941) and good calibration (Brier score = 0.125). These findings highlight the role of QEEG in predicting postoperative neurological dysfunction in TAAD patients.

conclusionThrough perioperative QEEG monitoring of TAAD patients, combined with clinical indicators such as cardiopulmonary bypass time and preoperative mental status, we developed clinical predictive models for AO and TND after surgery. These models allow for early detection of postoperative brain function impairment, as assessed by QEEG parameters monitored intraoperatively and during the first 2 hours after surgery, a period chosen based on clinical definitions of delayed awakening and supported by the findings of this study. This study provides evidence supporting postoperative brain function monitoring in TAAD patients, with potential clinical implications for improved outcomes.

Indexed as

Aortic DissectionBrainElectroencephalographyNomogramsPostoperative ComplicationsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39869385
PMCPMC12372716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.