ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025
Assessment of simulation training efficacy in improving microsurgical skills: a retrospective analysis.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Two-stage replantation of a severed digit with blood supply from the first dorsal metatarsal artery.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicrosurgery demands an intensive period of skill acquisition due to its inherent complexity. The development and implementation of innovative training methods are essential for enhancing microsurgical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a simulation training program on the clinical results of fingertip replantation surgeries. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 276 replanted digits from 232 patients were included in this study, with a follow-up period of 6 months. Surgeons were identified and divided into trained and control groups, with the trained group receiving the rat tail training program. Primary outcomes included survival rates, replantation duration for each fingertip, degrees of flexion, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test results, static two-point discrimination scores, Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) scores, and the incidence rates of complications such as arterial insufficiency and pulp atrophy.
resultsOut of 1191 patients screened, 232 met the criteria for analysis. The average patient age was 41.3 years, predominantly male (87.1%). Trained microsurgeons performing Zone 1A replantation had higher success rates, shorter surgery durations, and fewer arterial complications compared to their untrained counterparts. For Zone 1B, they also showed improved operation times, decreased venous congestion and pulp atrophy, and better sensation outcomes. The results of trained group remained consistent across both single and multiple replantation, while the control group's outcomes varied in multiple replantation with less favorable results. The trained group reported better scores on the MHQ at 6-month follow-ups, particularly regarding work performance, pain levels, aesthetics, and satisfaction.
conclusionsThe simulation training program using a rat tail model has proven effective in enhancing the skills necessary for improved fingertip replantation. Participants in the program performed surgeries more efficiently and achieved better clinical outcomes. The structure of the training has demonstrated benefits, which may lead to improvements in various microsurgical procedures, positively impacting trainee surgeons, patient care, and the broader medical community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.