Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39869336›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Using Smartphone GPS Data to Detect the Risk of Adolescent Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors.

Randy P Auerbach, Paul A Bloom, David Pagliaccio, Ranqing Lan, Hanga Galfalvy, Alma Bitran, Katherine Durham, Ryan Crowley, Karla Joyce, Ashley Blanchard and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Emotion-Processing Biases and Neural Connectivity in Remitted Major Depressive Disorder among Adolescents.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026
    Article
  5. Understanding sleep and smartphone use in diverse adolescents through passive digital monitoring.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Randy P AuerbachDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Paul A BloomDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York.
David PagliaccioDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Ranqing LanDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Hanga GalfalvyDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Alma BitranDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Katherine DurhamDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Ryan CrowleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene.
Karla JoyceDepartment of Psychiatry, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ashley BlanchardDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Lauren S ChernickDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Peter S DayanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Julia GreenblattDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Lauren E KahnDepartment of Psychiatry, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Giovanna PortaDepartment of Psychiatry, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Trinity C TseDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Jeffrey F CohnDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Louis-Philippe MorencyLanguage Technology Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
David A BrentDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Nicholas B AllenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene.

Funding

MAPS: Mobile Assessment for the Prediction of SuicideU01MH116923 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI ALLEN, NICHOLAS B, AUERBACH, RANDY PATRICK · 2018 to 2022
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH116923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Suicide rates among adolescents continue to rise, but there are a lack of clinical tools to predict when youths may be at risk for suicidal behaviors. Objective: To identify whether geolocation metrics, assessed through an app installed on adolescents' personal smartphones, could detect the risk of next-week suicidal events and clinically meaningful suicidal ideation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series study included high-risk adolescents aged 13 to 18 years reporting a current affective and/or substance use disorder, oversampled for suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STB). Participants were recruited from the greater New York City and Pittsburgh communities through psychiatric outpatient programs, emergency departments, medical center research registries, and social media. Participants installed the Effortless Assessment Research System (EARS) software application onto their personal smartphones, which obtained passive sensor data, including geolocation metrics (via the global positioning system [GPS]), as well as weekly experience sampling data probing STB for the duration of the 6-month study. Adolescents also completed clinical assessments at baseline as well as during the 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up assessments. Statistical analysis was performed from March 2023 to November 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Repeated measures mixed-effects logistic models estimated whether weekly aggregates of geolocation features (ie, entropy, homestay, distance traveled) were associated with next-week suicidal events (ie, suicide attempts, psychiatric hospitalizations, emergency department visits for suicide concerns) and clinically meaningful ideation (via weekly experience sampling). Results: Overall, 186 participants were included in this study (148 [79.6%] female; 19 [10.2%] Asian, 23 [12.4%] Black, and 106 [57.0%] White), with a mean (SD) age of 16.4 (1.7) years. Greater homestay (amount of time spent at home) on a given week, relative to one's own mean, was associated with 2-fold greater odds of suicidal events during the subsequent week (odds ratio, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.15-3.45]). Results were not significant for entropy and distance traveled metrics. However, using leave-future-out validation, the accuracy of the homestay model was modest (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.50-0.78]). Conclusions and Relevance: Advancements in smartphone technology afford unique opportunities to capture affective and behavioral dynamics that presage suicide risk. This case series study found that greater homestay obtained through smartphone GPS data over the course of a week, relative to one's own mean, was associated with greater odds of a suicidal event in the subsequent week. Although accuracy was modest, these findings offer a novel starting point for suicide prevention research, particularly as smartphone sensor data may have the capacity to identify who is at risk while also providing an opportunity to deliver clinical tools when that risk is greatest.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorGeographic Information SystemsSmartphoneSuicidal IdeationAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleMobile ApplicationsNew York CityRisk AssessmentSuicide, Attempted

Identifiers

PMID39869336
PMCPMC11773992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.