ArticleJAMA neurology2025
Predicting Individual Pain Sensitivity Using a Novel Cortical Biomarker Signature.
Article in JAMA neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modulation of evoked alpha oscillatory activity in the frontocentral region during analgesia by non-invasive brain stimulation.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Trial
- Peak Alpha Frequency Is Not Significantly Altered by Five Days of Experimental Pain and Repetitive Transcranial Stimulation of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Trial
- Electroencephalography research in neuropathic pain (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- A systematic review and empiric examination of the conceptual and analytic overlap between allostatic load and multimorbidity.SSM - population health · 2026Article
- Article
- From Association to Prediction: Translational Barriers in Pain Biomarker Research.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting Pain: Electroencephalography Signatures of Neural Integration During Experimental Tonic Thermal Pain.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Article
- Association of widespread pain and peak alpha frequency cannot be isolated to a single network.Pain reports · 2026Article
- Temporal Interference Stimulation of the Motor Cortex Produces Frequency-Dependent Analgesia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Alpha oscillations in pain neuromodulation: From resting rhythms to reactive networks.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Article
- Magnetoencephalographic Spectral Abnormalities and Explainable Machine Learning of Neuropathic-Like Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Disrupted Corticomuscular Coherence and Force Steadiness During Acute Low Back Pain.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multifactorial Machine Learning Algorithm Integration of Pain Mechanisms Can Predict the Efficacy of 3-Week NSAID Plus Paracetamol in Patients With Painful Knee Osteoarthritis.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025Article
- Differential Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Mood and Pain Symptoms in People With Chronic Pain and Major Depressive Disorders-A Review.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025Review
- Brain Biomarkers for Pain Sensitivity.JAMA neurology · 2025Article
- The effect of prolonged elbow pain and rTMS on TMS-evoked potentials: A TMS-EEG study.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- The intrinsic reason why complementary tests (clinical neurophysiology, neuroimaging, skin biopsy) cannot establish the diagnosis of neuropathic pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The effect of depression on the peak alpha frequency as a biomarker of pain sensitivity.Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Biomarkers would greatly assist decision-making in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of chronic pain. Objective: To undertake analytical validation of a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for pain consisting of 2 measures: sensorimotor peak alpha frequency (PAF) and corticomotor excitability (CME). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study at a single center (Neuroscience Research Australia) recruited participants from November 2020 to October 2022 through notices placed online and at universities across Australia. Participants were healthy adults aged 18 to 44 years with no history of chronic pain or a neurological or psychiatric condition. Participants experienced a model of prolonged temporomandibular pain with outcomes collected over 30 days. Electroencephalography to assess PAF and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess CME were recorded on days 0, 2, and 5. Pain was assessed twice daily from days 1 through 30. Exposure: Participants received an injection of nerve growth factor (NGF) to the right masseter muscle on days 0 and 2 to induce prolonged temporomandibular pain lasting up to 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The predictive accuracy of the PAF/CME biomarker signature was determined using a nested control-test scheme: machine learning models were run on a training set (n = 100), where PAF and CME were predictors and pain sensitivity was the outcome. The winning classifier was assessed on a test set (n = 50) comparing the predicted pain labels against the true labels. Results: Among the final sample of 150 participants, 66 were female and 84 were male; the mean (SD) age was 25.1 (6.2) years. The winning classifier was logistic regression, with an outstanding area under the curve (AUC = 1.00). The locked model assessed on the test set had excellent performance (AUC = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99). Results were reproduced across a range of methodological parameters. Moreover, inclusion of sex and pain catastrophizing as covariates did not improve model performance, suggesting the model including biomarkers only was more robust. PAF and CME biomarkers showed good to excellent test-retest reliability. Conclusions and Relevance: This study provides evidence for a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for pain sensitivity. The combination of accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability suggests the PAF/CME biomarker signature has substantial potential for clinical translation, including predicting the transition from acute to chronic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.