Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39869323›Full record

ArticleJAMA neurology2025

Predicting Individual Pain Sensitivity Using a Novel Cortical Biomarker Signature.

Nahian S Chowdhury, Chuan Bi, Andrew J Furman, Alan K I Chiang, Patrick Skippen, Emily Si, Samantha K Millard, Sarah M Margerison, Darrah Spies, Michael L Keaser and 4 more

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Modulation of evoked alpha oscillatory activity in the frontocentral region during analgesia by non-invasive brain stimulation.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Alpha oscillations in pain neuromodulation: From resting rhythms to reactive networks.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nahian S ChowdhuryCenter for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Chuan BiDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Andrew J FurmanDepartment of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore.
Alan K I ChiangCenter for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Patrick SkippenCenter for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Emily SiCenter for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Samantha K MillardCenter for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah M MargerisonDepartment of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore.
Darrah SpiesDepartment of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore.
Michael L KeaserDepartment of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore.
Joyce T Da SilvaDepartment of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore.
Shuo ChenDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Siobhan M SchabrunThe Gray Centre for Mobility and Activity, Parkwood Institute, St Joseph's Healthcare, London, Ontario, Canada.
David A SeminowiczDepartment of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Biomarkers would greatly assist decision-making in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of chronic pain. Objective: To undertake analytical validation of a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for pain consisting of 2 measures: sensorimotor peak alpha frequency (PAF) and corticomotor excitability (CME). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study at a single center (Neuroscience Research Australia) recruited participants from November 2020 to October 2022 through notices placed online and at universities across Australia. Participants were healthy adults aged 18 to 44 years with no history of chronic pain or a neurological or psychiatric condition. Participants experienced a model of prolonged temporomandibular pain with outcomes collected over 30 days. Electroencephalography to assess PAF and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess CME were recorded on days 0, 2, and 5. Pain was assessed twice daily from days 1 through 30. Exposure: Participants received an injection of nerve growth factor (NGF) to the right masseter muscle on days 0 and 2 to induce prolonged temporomandibular pain lasting up to 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The predictive accuracy of the PAF/CME biomarker signature was determined using a nested control-test scheme: machine learning models were run on a training set (n = 100), where PAF and CME were predictors and pain sensitivity was the outcome. The winning classifier was assessed on a test set (n = 50) comparing the predicted pain labels against the true labels. Results: Among the final sample of 150 participants, 66 were female and 84 were male; the mean (SD) age was 25.1 (6.2) years. The winning classifier was logistic regression, with an outstanding area under the curve (AUC = 1.00). The locked model assessed on the test set had excellent performance (AUC = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99). Results were reproduced across a range of methodological parameters. Moreover, inclusion of sex and pain catastrophizing as covariates did not improve model performance, suggesting the model including biomarkers only was more robust. PAF and CME biomarkers showed good to excellent test-retest reliability. Conclusions and Relevance: This study provides evidence for a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for pain sensitivity. The combination of accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability suggests the PAF/CME biomarker signature has substantial potential for clinical translation, including predicting the transition from acute to chronic pain.

Indexed as

Chronic PainMotor CortexPain ThresholdSensorimotor CortexAdolescentAdultBiomarkersCohort StudiesElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleNerve Growth FactorPain MeasurementTranscranial Magnetic StimulationBiomarkersNerve Growth Factor

Identifiers

PMID39869323
PMCPMC11773403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.