Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39869254›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2025

Cognitive representation of gait: differences in memory structures between individuals after total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty.

Dagmar Linnhoff, René Kaiser, Klaus Mattes, Cornelia Frank

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dagmar LinnhoffDepartment of Human Movement Science, University of Hamburg, Turmweg 2, 20148, Hamburg, Germany. dagmar.linnhoff@uni-hamburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8371-8338
René KaiserDepartment of Clinical Research and Sport Science, OrthoCentrum Hamburg, Hansastr. 1-3, 20149, Hamburg, Germany.
Klaus MattesDepartment of Human Movement Science, University of Hamburg, Turmweg 2, 20148, Hamburg, Germany.
Cornelia FrankHuman Movement Science Group, University of Bremen, Am Fallturm 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to examine differences in the gait-specific cognitive representation structures between individuals after total knee- (TKA) and after total hip-joint arthroplasty (THA). The cognitive representation structure was compared between three groups: 1. three months after TKA (n = 12), 2. three months after THA (n = 12), and 3. healthy control group (CG) (n = 12) using the structural dimensional analysis of mental representation (SDA-M). Additionally, perceived joint function was rated by either the KOOS, JR. or HOOS, JR. Mean distribution of perceived joint function was not significantly different between the TKA (60.35 ± 11.2) and THA group (68.01 ± 13.8) (t = - 1.425; p = .173). In the cognitive representation structure, the THA group exhibited functional differences from the TKA group and control group, both of which showed a functional structure. Three months after hip joint replacement the gait-specific cognitive representation structure seems to reflect joint function-specific deviations. Therefore, focussing on functional recovery of cognitive gait representation may facilitate gait rehabilitation in individuals after hip replacement.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCognitionGaitMemoryAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsArthroplastyFunctional representation structureGait deviationLong-term memoryMental representationStructural dimensional analysis

Identifiers

PMID39869254
PMCPMC12055890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.