ArticleCurrent microbiology2025
Isolation and Identification of Apiospora intestini from Hedera nepalensis Leaf Blight and Determination of Antagonism of Phomopsis sp.
Article in Current microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Accumulation of Chemical Components of Volatile Oil inEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Toxicity Assay and Pathogenic Process Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In order to identify the pathogen responsible for Hedera nepalensis leaf blight and investigate effective biocontrol strategies, samples were collected from 10 significantly infected areas at Southwest Forestry University; four to six infected leaves were gathered from each area, followed by the isolation and purification of strains from the infected plant leaves using tissue isolation and hyphae-purification techniques. We conducted an examination of the biological characteristics and compared the inhibitory effects of different concentrations of Phomopsis sp. (50%, 25%, 16.7%, 12.5%, and 10%) with 20 µg/mL of synthetic fungicides (Mancozeb, Carbendazim, Polyoxin, and Hymexazol) on the pathogen, while also assessing the control efficacy of Phomopsis sp. against the pathogen in the greenhouse. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, β-tubulin (TUB), and translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF) analysis revealed that the highly virulent strain causing H. nepalensis leaf blight was Apiospora intestini. Additionally, it was found that 25% Phomopsis sp. significantly inhibited Apiospora intestini when compared to synthetic fungicides, and Phomopsis sp. supernatant possesses both protective and curative effects against the plant diseases caused by Apiospora intestini. The results of this study serve as a reference for the prevention and treatment of H. nepalensis leaf blight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39869227What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.