Observational studyArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
The outcome of early perineal rehabilitation in obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a single-center experience.
Observational study in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the physical: exploring the complexities of Women's health after severe perineal trauma-a cross-sectional study on predictors of health-related quality of life in Sweden.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) on symptoms and quality of life in women who experienced third- and fourth-degree perineal tears (Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries, OASIS) during childbirth. OASIS can lead to anal incontinence and dyspareunia, having important implications regarding the quality of life and health of women but, unfortunately, there is no standard practice for postpartum care following OASIS.
methodsIn this retrospective observational study, patients diagnosed with OASIS between January 2016 and June 2023 were enrolled. Since 2016, all women with OASIS have been routinely referred for physiatric evaluation and pelvic floor rehabilitation. Validated questionnaires (Wexner score and Marinoff scale) were administered to enrolled women to assess anal incontinence and dyspareunia.
resultsThe study included 148 women, of whom 88 responded to the questionnaires. Participants were divided into two groups: those who underwent PFPT (N = 68) and those who declined it (N = 20). The mean follow-up period was 1447.35 days. The Wexner score was lower in the PFPT group compared to the no-PFPT group (p = 0.050). The Marinoff score did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.381).
conclusionPFPT was shown to be effective in reducing AI symptoms in women with OASIS, improving quality of life and maintaining its effects in the long term, but without providing benefits for dyspareunia. Strengths of this study include the use of validated questionnaires, the long follow-up period, and the involvement of a specialized team of physiatrists and physiotherapists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.