Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39869198›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2026

[Nationwide evaluation of medical training in psychiatry and psychotherapy in Germany].

Nina Schubotz, Julia-Maleen Kronsbein, Angela Zapp, Rebecca Reichel

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nina SchubotzAlexianer St. Joseph-Krankenhaus Berlin, Gartenstraße 1, 13088, Berlin, Deutschland. nina@schubotz.org.
Julia-Maleen KronsbeinPraxis für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Usedom, Klenzestraße 14, 17424, Heringsdorf, Deutschland.
Angela ZappZentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit (ZI), J5, 68159, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Rebecca ReichelUniversitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Tübingen, Calwerstraße 14, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date there has been no evaluation of further training and working conditions in medical specialist training in psychiatry and psychotherapy in Germany. In order to counteract the lack of young talent and ensure long-term care for patients, quality assurance is essential. AIM OF THE WORK: The evaluation aims to identify strengths and weaknesses of the further training and to derive measures for improvement. For a better classification, a comparison is also made with other disciplines with medical specialist further training. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe online-based survey took place from 15 May 2023 to 30 June 2023. The results refer to 315 questionnaires from 202 physicians in further training and 113 medical specialists (specialist title for less than 3 years).

resultsOf those surveyed 64% were satisfied with the quality and implementation of the general psychiatry part, only 11% were considering changing their specialty and 18% were considering moving their job abroad due to the training conditions. There is a need for improvement in induction and in the organization of the training. In addition, significant time and financial burdens for mandatory external training events as well as the lack of compatibility between training and research, teaching and care work responsibilities were criticized. DISCUSSION: Overall, it appears that the working conditions are better than in other disciplines. With respect to the potential for improvement, the creation of financing for further training is essential; certificates for high quality training and the publication of positive examples can also contribute to quality assurance and improvement.

Indexed as

PsychiatryPsychotherapyAdultCurriculumFemaleGermanyHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesCare workLack of young talentQuality assuranceSpecialist trainingWorking conditions

Identifiers

PMID39869198
PMCPMC12808157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.