Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39869052›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols2025

Quantifying Competitive Fitness in Yeast with High-Throughput Fluorescence Microscopy Imaging.

Aruni S Sumanarathne, Aleeza C Gerstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aruni S SumanarathneDepartment of Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-3875
Aleeza C GersteinDepartment of Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0781-9356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competitive fitness is a fundamental concept in evolutionary biology that captures the ability of organisms to survive, reproduce, and compete for resources in their environment. Competitive fitness is typically assessed in the lab by growing two or more competitors together and measuring the frequency of each at multiple time points. Traditional microbial competitive fitness assays are labor intensive and involve plating on solid medium and counting colonies. Here, we describe a method to quantitatively measure competitive fitness using fluorescence microscopic imaging and machine-learning-enabled image analysis to directly count the number of cells from each competitor in the mixed population. This high-throughput, primarily automated, and efficient process gives accurate and reproducible results for competitive fitness. Here, we describe the entire process, from sample preparation through microscopy to quantification, and provide instructions and scripts for the image analysis, fitness calculations, and sample data visualizations. © 2025 The Author(s). Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Sample preparation Basic Protocol 2: Photographing fluorescing and non-fluorescing cells using an EVOS microscope Basic Protocol 3: Counting fluorescing and non-fluorescing cells with Orbit Image Analysis Basic Protocol 4: Getting the average cell counts per well and changing the file names Basic Protocol 5: Calculating competitive fitness using R.

Indexed as

Genetic FitnessHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSaccharomyces cerevisiaeMachine LearningMicroscopy, FluorescenceImage analysisOrbitR

Identifiers

PMID39869052
PMCPMC11771579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.