ReviewPacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE2025
Pacing and Ablation Technique Using Microelectrode for Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using a Local Impedance-Guided Catheter.
Review in Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Local multifrequency impedance changes after radiofrequency ablation in human atria: potential use for tissue characterization.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe IntellaNav MiFi OI catheter (MiFi) is equipped with a sensor for local impedance (LI) monitoring and three mini-electrodes. In this study, we investigated the target LI values for a successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) under the pacing and ablation technique using the MiFi catheter.
methodsTwenty-seven patients underwent PVI using the MiFi catheter under mini electrode pacing from the MiFi catheter. The local impedance (LI) changes, generator impedance (GI) changes, and the time to capture loss were evaluated.
resultsFirst-pass isolations were obtained in 15 patients (57.7 %) for right PVs and in 22 patients (84.6 %) for left PVs. At gap sites, the impedance decrease was smaller than at non-gap sites (non-gap sites vs. gap sites; LI drop, 23.2 [±10.3] vs. 15.6 [±7.7] Ω, p < 0.0001; GI drop, 4.8 [±4.1] vs. 2.7 [3.9] Ω, p = 0.0026; %LI drop, -19.3 [±7.4] vs. -13.1 [±6.1] %, p < 0.0001; % GI drop, -5.1 [±4.2] vs. -2.9 [±4.2] %, p = 0.0020), suggesting that changes in impedance could be useful for predicting gaps. The cutoff values for predicting no gaps were identified as 15.0 Ω for the LI drop and -13.74% for the %LI drop.
conclusionThe LI showed greater changes than the GI and was also useful for predicting gaps. The cutoff values of 15.0 Ω for the LI drop and -13.74% for the %LI drop could predict conduction gaps. Under the monitoring of the LI, the pacing and ablation technique proved useful for PVI, even though the MiFi catheter does not have a CF sensor or ablation indices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.