Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39868864›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025

Hypothermic machine perfusion in uterus transplantation in a porcine model: A proof of concept and the first results in graft preservation.

Carla Héléna Sousa, Marion Mercier, Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq, Erwan Flecher, Claude Bendavid, David Val-Laillet, Juliette Ferrant, Sylvie Jaillard, Emma Loiseau, Julien Branchereau and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A decade of human uterus transplantation.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A Comprehensive Review ofTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Carla Héléna SousaDepartment of Gynecology, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9081-7959
Marion MercierDepartment of Gynecology, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France.
Nathalie Rioux-LeclercqInstitute for Research in Health, Environment and Work (Irset), Rennes, France.
Erwan FlecherDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
Claude BendavidLaboratory of Biochemistry, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
David Val-LailletINRAE, INSERM, University Of Rennes, NuMeCan Institute, Nutrition Metabolisms And Cancer, Rennes, France.
Juliette FerrantUnité Mixte de Recherche (UMR)1236, Université Rennes, INSERM, Etablissement Français du Sang Bretagne, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2193-4104
Sylvie JaillardInstitute for Research in Health, Environment and Work (Irset), Rennes, France.
Emma LoiseauDepartment of Gynecology, CHU Nantes Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.
Julien BranchereauDepartment of Urology, CHU Nantes Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.
Yanis BerkaneUnité Mixte de Recherche (UMR)1236, Université Rennes, INSERM, Etablissement Français du Sang Bretagne, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Rennes, France.
Krystel Nyangoh TimohDepartment of Gynecology, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France.
Isis CartonDepartment of Gynecology, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4587-3828
Maëla Le LousDepartment of Gynecology, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France.
Vincent LavoueDepartment of Gynecology, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France.
Ludivine DionDepartment of Gynecology, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France.

Funding

Société de Chirurgie Gynécologie et Pelvienne & Gedeon Richter Bourse de recherche 2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGraft optimization is a necessity in order to develop uterus transplantation from brain-dead donors, as a complement to living donors, as these grafts are rare and the last organs retrieved in multiple organ donation. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and interest of hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) in uterus transplantation using a porcine model; secondary outcomes were the evaluation of the graft's tolerance to a prolonged cold ischaemia time and to find new biomarkers of uterus viability. MATERIAL AND

methodsFifteen uterus allotransplantations were performed in a porcine model, after 18 h of cold ischaemia, divided in three groups: Static cold storage in a HTK solution, HMP (with the VitaSmart (™) machine Bridge to Life Ltd.) with a UW-MP solution, and static cold storage in a UW solution. The main outcome was macroscopic: uterine arteries pulsatility, recoloration, and bleeding at the cut. Secondary outcomes were histological analyses (Zitkute and inflammation scores), caspase3 immunohistochemistry and plasmatic dosage of biomarkers.

results14/15 allotransplantations were performed according to the protocol and met the criteria of macroscopic vitality. Grafts treated with HMP (MP did not show significantly more tissue) damage than the recipient's uterus, contrary to grafts in static cold storage, independently of the solution used. This difference disappeared one and 3 h after uterus transplantation. Plasma dosages before and after uterus transplantation did not allow to identify a new biomarker of uterus viability.

conclusionsHMP is feasible in a porcine model, without inflicting damage on the grafts during cold ischaemia time. Grafts exposed to HMP seemed to better endure reperfusion phenomena, but this advantage did not last over time.

Indexed as

Cold IschemiaHypothermia, InducedOrgan PreservationPerfusionUterusAdenosineAnimalsFemaleGlutathioneGraft SurvivalModels, AnimalOrgan Preservation SolutionsRaffinoseSwineAdenosineGlutathioneOrgan Preservation SolutionsRaffinoseanimal modelassisted reproductive technologieshypothermic machine perfusioninfertilityuterus transplantation

Identifiers

PMID39868864
PMCPMC11871101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.