ReviewJournal of virology2025
Flow virometry: recent advancements, best practices, and future frontiers.
Review in Journal of virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the utility of a nanoscale flow cytometer for detection of surface proteins on HIV and extracellular vesicles.Virology journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Scalable purification enables high-quality virus-like particles for therapeutic translation.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2025Article
- Characterization of Nanobody Binding to Distinct Regions of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein by Flow Virometry.Viruses · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The imperative for developing robust tools to detect, analyze, and characterize viruses has become increasingly evident as they continue to threaten human health. In this review, we focus on recent advancements in studying human viruses with flow virometry (FV), an emerging technique that has gained considerable momentum over the past 5 years. These advancements include the application of FV in viral surface phenotyping, viral protein functionality, virus sorting, vaccine development, and diagnostics. With examples illustrated using primary data from our recent studies, we demonstrate that FV is a powerful yet underutilized methodology that, when employed with best practices and experimental rigor, can be highly valuable for studying individual virion heterogeneity, virus phenotypes, and virus-antibody interactions. In this review, we also address the current challenges when performing FV studies, propose strategies to overcome these obstacles, and outline best practices for both new and experienced researchers. Finally, we discuss the promising future prospects of FV within the broader context of virology research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.