ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2025
Genetic Services in Appalachia Conference Series.
Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sociodemographic trends in prostate cancer: insights from the All of Us Research Program.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined the data generated as part of a seven-session webinar series that focused on genetics care provision in the medically underserved, rural Appalachian region and examined how these services have adapted to challenging practice environments. Barriers and facilitators to care in our region were considered. Data included a baseline survey of registrants, transcripts of sessions, and feedback about sessions. We analyzed data with a sequential and concurrent mixed methods approach. Registrants (n = 137) were disproportionately healthcare providers with genetic services expertise (37.2%). Approximately half (43.8%) of registrants were from KY, WV, and TN in the central Appalachian region. Our baseline survey found that the most noted barriers were the cost of services, lack of providers, and access to care. The most common facilitator was telehealth. Analysis of transcripts identified barriers that were consistent with those noted in the baseline survey, but additional support and network opportunities were discussed to allow for learning across services. Numerous barriers to service delivery were noted; however, despite challenges, participants identified opportunities and resources in the community. These insights will inform a research agenda aimed at advancing genetics services in rural Appalachia, addressing challenges, and leveraging assets for improved healthcare access and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.