Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39868765›Full record

ArticleBirth defects research2025

Comorbidities and Healthcare Utilization Among Young Adults With Congenital Heart Defects by Down Syndrome Status-Congenital Heart Survey to Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and wellbeinG, 2016-2019.

Vanessa I Villamil, Karrie F Downing, Matthew E Oster, Jennifer G Andrews, Maureen K Galindo, Jenil Patel, Scott E Klewer, Wendy N Nembhard, Sherry L Farr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth defects research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vanessa I VillamilNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5428-8474
Karrie F DowningNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3063-1781
Matthew E OsterNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jennifer G AndrewsUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Maureen K GalindoUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Jenil PatelDepartment of Epidemiology and the Arkansas Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4875-7390
Scott E KlewerUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Wendy N NembhardDepartment of Epidemiology and the Arkansas Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8318-4049
Sherry L FarrNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

CDC HHSIntramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlmost half of individuals born with Down syndrome (DS) have congenital heart defects (CHDs). Yet, little is known about the health and healthcare needs of adults with CHDs and DS. Therefore, we examined comorbidities and healthcare utilization of this population.

methodsData were from the 2016-2019 Congenital Heart Survey to Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and well-beinG (CH STRONG), a survey of 19-38-year-olds with CHDs identified through birth defects registries in Arkansas, Arizona, and Atlanta. Outcome estimates were standardized to the CH STRONG eligible population. Multivariable Poisson regression generated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) for associations between DS and each outcome, adjusting for covariates, including CHD severity.

resultsAmong 1500 respondents, 9.1% had DS. Compared to those without DS, respondents with DS were more commonly male (55.5% vs. 45.0%), < 25 years old (51.8% vs. 42.7%), non-Hispanic White (72.3% vs. 69.3%), and publicly insured (77.4% vs. 22.8%; all p < 0.05). Of adults with CHDs and DS, 5.5% had cardiac comorbidities, 19.3% had emergency room (ER) visits, 6.2% had hospital admissions, and 1.2% had cost-related delays in care in the last year; 0.1 to 0.6 times lower than adults with CHDs without DS. Additionally, 26.7% had non-cardiac comorbidities (aPR = 1.25 [0.92-1.72]), most commonly sleep apnea (13.7% vs. 3.2%, aPR = 3.67 [2.02-6.67]). Receipt of cardiology care in the last 2 years was similarly low (52.7% vs. 44.7%).

conclusionsAdults with CHDs and DS comprise a substantial percentage of adults with CHDs and have unique health and healthcare needs. Half of adults with CHDs and DS are not receiving recommended routine cardiac care.

Indexed as

Down SyndromeHeart Defects, CongenitalPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultArizonaArkansasComorbidityFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultcardiologycongenital heart defectsDown syndromehealthcare utilization

Identifiers

PMID39868765
PMCPMC11837948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.