Trial reportBritish journal of health psychology2025
Why do most people on dialysis not accept psychological care to increase perceptions of control in life?
Trial report in British journal of health psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Decisional Conflicts in Kidney Replacement Therapy for Patients With Grade 5 Chronic Kidney Disease: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.Journal of renal care · 2025Pooled it
- Why do most people on dialysis not accept psychological care to increase perceptions of control in life?British journal of health psychology · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPeople with chronic kidney failure (CKF) on dialysis who perceive little control in life are at risk for a reduced well-being. We developed and tested an intervention aiming to enhance their perceptions of control. To gain insight into patients' care needs and acceptance of the intervention, we examined the prevalence of patients perceiving low control, their characteristics, and their reasons for (not) accepting the intervention.
designWe consecutively screened 430 people on dialysis on perceived control, with those reporting low control offered to participate in the intervention study.
methodsWe used data of a Randomized Controlled Trial examining the feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of the intervention. Perceived control was assessed with the Pearlin Mastery scale.
resultsAbout half (55%) of the sample perceived low control, particularly those with more comorbidities. Most persons eligible for receiving the intervention did not accept the intervention (89%), especially older persons. Main reasons were experiencing little burden of perceiving low control as well as no need for care to increase perceived control.
conclusionsA significant number of people on dialysis perceived low control in life, yet very few accepted an intervention for regaining a sense of control. In-depth qualitative research is needed for a more comprehensive understanding of the personal experience and perceived impact of low control on health and well-being, activities and relationships as well as people's reasons and needs for enhancing a sense of control and attitude towards psychological interventions aiming to enhance perceived control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.