ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Genomic clustering tendency of transcription factors reflects phase-separated transcriptional condensates at super-enhancers.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bipartite DNA binding domain of transcription factor BCL11B binds clustered short DNA sequence motifs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Dynamic regulation of endogenous transcription factor hubs at single-molecule resolution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Transcriptional condensates at super-enhancers mediate pH-dependent transcriptional control in innate immunity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Transcriptional Condensates: Epigenetic Reprogramming and Therapeutic Targets in Hematologic Malignancies.Cancers · 2025Review
- Liquid-liquid phase separation in super enhancer-driven oncogenesis: mechanisms, immune evasion, and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many transcription factors (TFs) have been shown to bind to super-enhancers, forming transcriptional condensates to activate transcription in various cellular systems. However, the genomic and epigenomic determinants of phase-separated transcriptional condensate formation remain poorly understood. Questions regarding which TFs tend to associate with transcriptional condensates and what factors influence their association are largely unanswered. Here we systematically analyzed 571 DNA sequence motifs across the human genome and 6650 TF binding profiles across different cell types to identify the molecular features contributing to the formation of transcriptional condensates. We found that the genomic distributions of sequence motifs for different TFs exhibit distinct clustering tendencies. Notably, TF motifs with a high genomic clustering tendency are significantly associated with super-enhancers. TF binding profiles showing a high genomic clustering tendency are further enriched at cell-type-specific super-enhancers. TFs with a high binding clustering tendency also possess high liquid-liquid phase separation abilities. Compared to nonclustered TF binding, densely clustered TF binding sites are more enriched at cell-type-specific super-enhancers with higher chromatin accessibility, elevated chromatin interaction and stronger association with cancer outcomes. Our results indicate that the clustered genomic binding patterns and the phase separation properties of TFs collectively contribute to the formation of transcriptional condensates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.