ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2024
Quantifying years of life lost in Australia: a multiple cause of death analysis.
Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in obesity-related cardiovascular and cancer mortality in Switzerland 1995-2019: an analysis of multiple causes of death.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Multiple cause of death during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population study In Colombia and Brazil.International journal of public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeaths in Australia and other high-income countries increasingly involve multiple conditions. However, key burden of disease measures typically only use the underlying cause of death (UC). We quantified sex and cause-specific years of life lost (YLL) based on UC compared with a method integrating multiple causes of death.
methodsCauses of death for all deaths in Australia (2015-17), mapped to 136 groups based on International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10), were ascribed using (1) the UC only and (2) a multiple cause weighting (WT) strategy. Applying the Global Burden of Disease 2010 life table, YLLUC and YLLWT rates were calculated for each sex and cause of death and compared using relative and absolute measures.
resultsAll-cause YLL rates were 113.4/1000 for males and 79.9/1000 for females. Cancers, cardiovascular diseases, external causes, respiratory diseases and nervous system diseases were the five biggest contributors to YLL for each method. For the top 20 causes combined, YLLWT rates were 10% lower for males (YLLWT = 74.93/1000 vs YLLUC = 67.38/1000) and 7% lower for females (YLLWT = 51.34/1000; YLLUC = 47.90/1000); YLLWT rates were lower for ischaemic heart disease and all cancers, but higher for diabetes and dementia, and for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in males. With multiple cause weighting, renal failure emerged among the top 20 causes of YLL, as did atrial fibrillation and hypertension among females. YLLWT rates for substance abuse, mood disorders, hypertension and schizophrenia were relatively high compared with YLLUC.
conclusionThe YLLWT metric highlights epidemiologically important conditions that are less often selected as the UC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.