Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39868449›Full record

ArticleProblemy endokrinologii2024

[Development of prognostic clinical and genetic models of the risk of low bone mineral density using neural network training].

B I Yalaev, A V Novikov, I R Minniakhmetov, R I Khusainova

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Problemy endokrinologii, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B I YalaevEndocrinology Research Centre.
A V NovikovEndocrinology Research Centre.
I R MinniakhmetovEndocrinology Research Centre.
R I KhusainovaEndocrinology Research Centre; Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics-Subdivision of the Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Funding

Non-US Government Research Support type
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoporosis is a common age-related disease with disabling consequences, the early diagnosis of which is difficult due to its long and hidden course, which often leads to diagnosis only after a fracture. In this regard, great expectations are placed on advanced developments in machine learning technologies aimed at predicting osteoporosis at an early stage of development, including the use of large data sets containing information on genetic and clinical predictors of the disease. Nevertheless, the inclusion of DNA markers in prediction models is fraught with a number of difficulties due to the complex polygenic and heterogeneous nature of the disease. Currently, the predictive power of neural network models is insufficient for their incorporation into modern osteoporosis diagnostic protocols. Studies in this area are sporadic, but are widely demanded, as their results are of great importance for preventive medicine. This leads to the need to search for the most effective machine learning approaches and optimise the selection of genetic markers as input parameters to neural network models.

aimto evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning and neural network analysis to develop predictive risk models for osteoporosis based on clinical predictors and genetic markers of osteoporetic fractures. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe predictive models were trained using a database of genotyping and clinical characteristics of 701 women and 501 men living in the Volga-Ural region of Russia. Anthropometric parameters, data on gender, bone mineral density level, and the results of genotyping of 152 polymorphic loci of candidate genes and replication loci of the GEFOS consortium's full genome-wide association search were included as input parameters.

resultsIt was found that the model for predicting low bone mineral density, including 6 polymorphic variants of the OPG gene (rs2073618, rs2073617, rs7844539, rs3102735, rs3134069) and 5 polymorphic variants of microRNA binding sites in the mRNA of genes involved in bone metabolism (COL11A1 - rs1031820, FGF2 - rs6854081, miR-146 - rs2910164, ZNF239 - rs10793442, SPARC - rs1054204 and VDR - rs11540149) (AUC=0.81 for men and AUC=0.82 for women).

conclusionThe results confirm the promising application of machine learning to predict the risk of osteoporosis at the preclinical stage of the disease based on the analysis of clinical and genetic factors.

Indexed as

Bone DensityModels, GeneticNeural Networks, ComputerOsteoporosisAdultAgedFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID39868449
PMCPMC11775677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.