ReviewEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Peroneus brevis split tear - A challenging diagnosis: A pictorial review of magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging. Part 1. Anatomical basis and clinical insights.
Review in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peroneus brevis tenosynovitis associated with hypertrophied peroneal tubercle: Comparative analysis of 2 cases and their etiologies.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Association between flat variants of the peroneus brevis tendon and split tears on magnetic resonance imaging.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Adhesiolysis of Peroneal Tendons via Distal Portals.Arthroscopy techniques · 2026Article
- Validation of an MRI-based classification of peroneus brevis tendon morphology: a four-type system with high inter-rater reliability.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Height and weight predict cross-sectional area of the peroneus brevis and longus tendons: Magnetic resonance imaging-based analysis of 164 adults.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnosing peroneus brevis split tears is a significant challenge, as many cases are missed both clinically and on imaging. Anatomical variations within the superior peroneal tunnel can contribute to peroneus brevis split tears or instability of the peroneal tendons. However, determining which anatomical variations predispose patients to these injuries remains challenging due to conflicting data in the literature. In this review, we present the current understanding of the role of anatomical variants in the development of peroneus brevis split tears. Many studies emphasize the significance of the retromalleolar groove and retromalleolar tubercle, the impact of a low-lying muscle belly, and the presence of accessory muscles within the superior peroneal tunnel as contributors to peroneal pathology. Hypertrophy of the peroneal tubercle or post-traumatic irregularities in the surface of the retromalleolar groove can accelerate degenerative changes in the peroneal tendons, potentially leading to peroneus brevis split tears. The topographic anatomy of the superior peroneal tunnel is essential for systematically performing ultrasound and interpreting magnetic resonance imaging of the ankle. The first part of this review focuses on the anatomical foundations of imaging diagnostics for peroneus brevis pathology. In the second part, we will examine the radiological spectrum of peroneal tendon injuries, offering a framework to enhance diagnostic confidence in this frequently underdiagnosed pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.