ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Assessment of hemodynamic disturbances and impaired ventricular filling in asymptomatic fontan patients: A 4D flow CMR study.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Four-Dimensional Flow in Fontan Patients: Advanced Haemodynamic Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Fontan procedure is a surgical intervention designed for patients with single ventricle physiology, wherein the systemic venous return is redirected into the pulmonary circulation, thereby facilitating passive pulmonary blood flow without the assistance of ventricular propulsion. Consequently, long-term follow-up of individuals who have undergone the asymptomatic Fontan procedure is essential. Objectives: The aims of this investigation were to: 1) examine the impact of flow components and kinetic energy (KE) parameters on hemodynamic disturbances in asymptomatic Fontan patients and control group; 2) Assess left ventricular diastolic dysfunction through the analysis of 4D flow parameters across different Fontan sub-groups; 3) Compare intracardiac flow parameters among Fontan sub-groups based on morphological features of the left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV). Methods: Twenty-five Fontan patients (mean age: 10 ± 3 years, male/female: 15/10) and fourteen control subjects (mean age: 10 ± 2 years, male/female: 8/6) were recruited retrospectively for the study. The Fontan patients were further categorized into three groups based on their ventricular function: left ventricular (LV), right ventricular (RV), and biventricular (BiV). Each participant underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, including cine and 4D flow sequences on a 3.0 T scanner. Ventricular flow components and KE were assessed using 4D flow. The study utilized cine images to analyze cardiac function and inter-ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony. Echocardiography evaluated functional ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Results: Fontan patients had a higher median functional single ventricle (FSV) residual volume compared to controls (28 % vs. 23 %, P = 0.034), with lower median FSV direct flow (32 % vs. 40 %, P = 0.005) and delayed ejection flow (17 % vs. 24 %, P = 0.024). The parameters of FSV normalized to the ventricular end-diastolic volume (KEi Conclusions: The altered flow pattern and reduced kinetic energy observed in Fontan patients may indicate hemodynamic disturbances and compromised ventricular filling. Reduced direct flow is associated with LV diastolic dysfunction in LV and BiV Fontan subgroups. Systemic LV exhibited a more efficient intracardiac flow pattern compare with systemic RV in Fontan patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.