ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Intraoperative circulation predict prolonged length of stay after head and neck free flap reconstruction: a retrospective study based on machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Predict Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Head and neck free flap reconstruction presents challenges in managing intraoperative circulation, potentially leading to prolonged length of stay (PLOS). Limited research exists on the associations between intraoperative circulation and PLOS given the difficulty of manual quantification of intraoperative circulation time-series data. Therefore, this study aimed to quantify intraoperative circulation data and investigate its association with PLOS after free flap reconstruction utilizing machine learning algorithms. Methods: 804 patients who underwent head and neck free flap reconstruction between September 2019 and February 2021 were included. Machine learning tools (Fourier transform, et al.) were utilized to extract features to quantify intraoperative circulation data. To compare the accuracy of quantified intraoperative circulation and manual intraoperative circulation assessments in the PLOS prediction, predictive models based on these 2 assessment methods were developed and validated. Results: Intraoperative circulation was quantified and a total of 114 features were extracted from intraoperative circulation data. Quantified intraoperative circulation models with a real-time predictive manner were constructed. A higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was observed in quantified intraoperative circulation data models (0.801 [95% CI, 0.733-0.869]) compared to manual intraoperative circulation assessment models (0.719 [95% CI, 0.641-0.797]) in PLOS prediction. Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms facilitated quantification of intraoperative circulation data. The developed real-time quantified intraoperative circulation prediction models based on this quantification offer a potential strategy to optimize intraoperative circulation management and mitigate PLOS following head and neck free flap reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.