ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Assessing Generative Model Coverage of Protein Structures with SHAPES.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in generative modeling enable efficient sampling of protein structures, but their tendency to optimize for designability imposes a bias toward idealized structures at the expense of loops and other complex structural motifs critical for function. We introduce SHAPES (Structural and Hierarchical Assessment of Proteins with Embedding Similarity) to evaluate five state-of-the-art generative models of protein structures. Using structural embeddings across multiple structural hierarchies, ranging from local geometries to global protein architectures, we reveal substantial undersampling of the observed protein structure space by these models. We use Fréchet Protein Distance (FPD) to quantify distributional coverage. Different models are distinct in their coverage behavior across different sampling noise scales and temperatures; the frequency of TERtiary Motifs (TERMs) further supports the observations. More robust sequence design and structure prediction methods are likely crucial in guiding the development of models with improved coverage of the designable protein space.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.