Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39868267›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Repeated tDCS at clinically-relevant field intensity can boost concurrent motor learning in rats.

Forouzan Farahani, Mihály Vöröslakos, Andrew M Birnbaum, Mohamad FallahRad, Preston T J A Williams, John H Martin, Lucas C Parra

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Forouzan FarahaniBiomedical Engineering Department, City College of New York.
Mihály VöröslakosNeuroscience Institute, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University.
Andrew M BirnbaumBiomedical Engineering Department, City College of New York.
Mohamad FallahRadBiomedical Engineering Department, City College of New York.
Preston T J A WilliamsMolecular, Cellular and Biomedical Science, CUNY School of Medicine.
John H MartinMolecular, Cellular and Biomedical Science, CUNY School of Medicine.
Lucas C ParraBiomedical Engineering Department, City College of New York.

Funding

Research Center in Minority Institutions (RCMI) at City CollegeU54MD017979 · NIMHD · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI M. Felice Marina GHILARDI · 2024 to 2026
$15.9M
Interaction of Motor Learning with Transcranial Direct Current - Efficacy and MechanismsR01NS130484 · NINDS · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI John H Martin, LUCAS C PARRA · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
Effects of direct-current stimulation on synaptic plasticityR01NS095123 · NINDS · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI PARRA, LUCAS C · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD017979NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095123NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS130484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electric fields used in clinical trials with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are small, with magnitudes that have yet to demonstrate measurable effects in preclinical animal models. We hypothesized that weak stimulation will nevertheless produce sizable effects, provided that it is applied concurrently with behavioral training, and repeated over multiple sessions. We tested this here in a rodent model of dexterous motor-skill learning. We developed a preparation that allows concurrent stimulation during the performance of a pellet-reaching task in freely behaving rats. The task was automated to minimize experimenter bias. We measured field magnitudes intracranially to calibrate the stimulation current. In this study, only male rats were used. Animals were trained for 20 min with concurrent epicranial tDCS over 10 daily sessions. Behavior was recorded with high-speed video to quantify reaching dynamics. We also measured motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) bilaterally with epidural microstimulation. The new electrode montage enabled stable stimulation over 10 sessions with a field intensity of 2V/m at the motor cortex. The number of successful reaches improved across days of training, and the rate of learning was higher in the anodal group as compared to sham-control animals (F(1)=7.12, p=0.008, N=24). MEPs were not systematically affected by tDCS. Posthoc analysis suggests that tDCS modulated motor learning only for right-pawed animals, improving success of reaching, but limiting stereotypy in these animals. Repeated and concurrent anodal tDCS can boost motor-skill learning at clinically-relevant field intensities. In this animal model the effect interacted with paw preference and was not associated with corticospinal excitability.

Identifiers

PMID39868267
PMCPMC11761702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.