ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Narrative 'twist' shifts within-individual neural representations of dissociable story features.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given the same input, one's understanding of that input can differ based on contextual knowledge. Where and how does the brain represent latent mental frameworks that interact with incoming sensory information to shape subjective interpretations? In this study, participants listened to the same auditory narrative twice; the narrative had a plot twist in the middle that dramatically shifted interpretations of the story. Using a robust within-subject whole-brain approach, we leveraged shifts in neural activity between the two listens to identify where latent representations are updated and, by extension, where interpretations are instantiated in the brain. We considered the story in terms of the broader narrative model and two specific components, episodes and characters. Neural activity patterns varied with participants' latent understanding of these three elements in overlapping but partially distinct sets of temporal, parietal, and prefrontal regions. Results suggest that even when the sensory information and the individual are held constant, heteromodal cortex represents individual narrative elements according not to their surface features, but to latent conceptual frameworks for understanding and interpreting narrative information.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.