Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39868253›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Comparative analysis of

Mark E Corkins, Adrian Romero-Mora, MaryAnne A Achieng, Nils O Lindström, Rachel K Miller

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark E CorkinsDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Research Center, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030.
Adrian Romero-MoraDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Research Center, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030.
MaryAnne A AchiengDepartment of Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles CA. 90033.
Nils O LindströmDepartment of Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles CA. 90033.
Rachel K MillerDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Research Center, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030.ORCID 0000-0001-6381-7198

Funding

Regulation of cell polarity by Wnt signalingR35GM122492 · NIGMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Sergei Sokol · 2017 to 2026
$5.0M
Novel Role of Nephron Epithelialization in Nuclear SignalingR01DK115655 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Rachel Katherine Miller · 2019 to 2026
$2.3M
Role of p53 in Kidney Development: Modeling Renal Anomalies of Li-Fraumeni PatientsR03DK118771 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MILLER, RACHEL KATHERINE · 2018 to 2019
$231k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK115655NIDDK NIH HHS R03 DK118771NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian kidney develops in three sequential stages referred to as the pronephros, mesonephros, and metanephros, each developing from the preceding form. All three phases of kidney development utilize epithelized tubules called nephrons, which function to take in filtrate from the blood or coelom and selectively reabsorb solutes the organism needs, leaving waste products to be excreted as urine. The pronephros are heavily studied in aquatic organisms such as zebrafish and Xenopus, as they develop quickly and are functional. The metanephros is a preferred mammalian kidney model, as it best recapitulates human disease. However, very little is known about the mesonephric stage of kidney development in any organism. The pronephros extend to form the mesonephric duct, which ultimately develops into the Wolffian duct in male amniotes. Meanwhile, in organisms that lay their eggs in aquatic environments, the mesonephric kidney is the final form that is generated. Therefore, further understanding of the development and physiology of these kidneys will provide insight into the urogenital system as well as its evolutionary conservation. To gain a better understanding of its structure and cell types, we analyzed the developing mesonephros by in situ and single-cell mRNA sequencing of cells the that make up the developing mesonephros. By comparing these data to those published for the

Indexed as

kidneymesonephrosnephronscSeqsingle-cell mRNA sequencingXenopus

Identifiers

PMID39868253
PMCPMC11760729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.