ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Machine learning identifies routine blood tests as accurate predictive measures of pollution-dependent poor cognitive function.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Several modifiable risk factors for dementia and related neurodegenerative diseases have been identified including education level, socio-economic status, and environmental exposures - however, how these population-level risks relate to individual risk remains elusive. To address this, we assess over 450 potential risk factors in one deeply clinically and demographically phenotyped cohort using random forest classifiers to determine predictive markers of poor cognitive function. This study aims to understand early risk factors for dementia by identifying predictors of poor cognitive performance amongst a comprehensive battery of imaging, blood, atmospheric pollutant and socio-economic measures. Methods: Random forest modelling was used to determine significant predictors of poor cognitive performance in a cohort of 324 individuals (age 61.6 ± 4.8 years; 150 males, 174 females) without extant neurological disease. 457 features were assessed including brain imaging measures of volume and iron deposition, blood measures of anaemia, inflammation, and heavy metal levels, social deprivation indicators and atmospheric pollution exposure. Results: Routinely assessed markers of anaemia including mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration were identified as robust predictors of poor general cognition, where both extremes (low and high) were associated with poor cognitive performance. The strongest, most consistent predictors of poor cognitive performance were environmental measures of atmospheric pollution, in particular, lead, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter. Feature analysis demonstrated a significant negative relationship between low mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration and high levels of atmospheric pollutants highlighting the potential of routinely assessed blood tests as a predictive measure of pollution-dependent cognitive functioning, at an individual level. Conclusions: Taken together, these data demonstrate how routine, inexpensive medical testing and local authority initiatives could help to identify and protect at-risk individuals. These findings highlight the potential to identify individuals for targeted, cost effective medical and social interventions to improve population cognitive health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.