ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Entrenchment and contingency in neutral protein evolution with epistasis.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein sequence evolution in the presence of epistasis makes many previously acceptable amino acid residues at a site unfavorable over time. This phenomenon of entrenchment has also been observed with neutral substitutions using Potts Hamiltonian models. Here, we show that simulations using these models often evolve non-neutral proteins. We introduce a Neutral-with-Epistasis (N×E) model that incorporates purifying selection to conserve fitness, a requirement of neutral evolution. N×E protein evolution revealed a surprising lack of entrenchment, with site-specific amino-acid preferences remaining remarkably conserved, in biologically realistic time frames despite extensive residue coupling. Moreover, we found that the overdispersion of the molecular clock is caused by rate variation across sites introduced by epistasis in individual lineages, rather than by historical contingency. Therefore, substitutional entrenchment and rate contingency may indicate that adaptive and other non-neutral evolutionary processes were at play during protein evolution.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.